top of page

Is the MBA Really Dying?

Writer: Parag Diwan
Parag Diwan
Sep 17
5 min read

What Thirty Years of False Obituaries Reveal About the Future of Business Education


Introduction: A Degree That Refuses to Die

Every few years, a new generation announces the end of the MBA. The dot-com era made the first case: why sit in a classroom when a garage and a business plan would do? MOOCs followed, promising that platforms like Coursera would dismantle the entire architecture of graduate management education. Bootcamps came next, arguing that skills would finally outcompete credentials. LinkedIn Learning offered the same argument for the price of a monthly subscription. Founder culture told its most ambitious twenty-two-year-olds to abandon enrolment altogether and build instead. And now artificial intelligence has revived the argument in its newest form: why study strategy when a machine can draft a SWOT analysis in ten seconds?


The verdict is always identical. The MBA, we are told, is finished.


And yet, three decades later, the admissions offices at Harvard, Wharton, and London Business School continue to turn away far more qualified candidates than they admit. The degree that has been declared dead more often than almost any credential in modern education continues, with something approaching defiance, to refuse the grave.


What, then, is actually happening? And more usefully: what would it genuinely require to displace a degree that has already outlasted six distinct waves of disruption?


Is the MBA really dying?

1. What the Application Data Actually Shows

The Pandemic Dip Was Real — and Temporary

MBA applications did decline sharply between 2019 and 2023. The enrolment surge of the pandemic years gave way to a genuine contraction: global business school applications fell by roughly 3 percent in 2022 and a further 5 percent in 2023. Those who worked inside business schools during that period will remember the mood in the room — tightening budgets, anxious marketing teams, and deans beginning to ask uncomfortable questions about relevance.


The Rebound: 2024–2025

Then the trend reversed, and did so decisively. The Graduate Management Admission Council's Application Trends Survey recorded global growth of approximately 12 percent in 2024, followed by continued growth of around 7 percent in 2025. This is not a statistical anomaly or a dead-cat bounce. It is two consecutive years of expansion, driven substantially by renewed demand for the most traditional format of all: the full-time, in-person, two-year MBA.


The growth, however, is not distributed evenly — and this is where the more consequential story begins.


2. The MBA Is Not Dying. It Is Relocating.


The MBA is relocating not disappearing

Where Demand Is Rising

A close reading of the 2025 regional data reveals a distinct pattern. Applications to Indian business schools rose by roughly 10 percent. East and Southeast Asian programmes surged by approximately 25 percent. Continental Europe grew by around 11 percent.


Where Demand Is Cooling

Meanwhile, the traditional English-speaking strongholds are losing ground on the international side. US applications slipped modestly, UK programmes recorded a mid-single-digit decline, and Canadian business schools saw a marked drop in international applicants — a shift driven primarily by tightening visa and immigration policy rather than any diminished appetite for the degree itself.


What This Actually Means

None of this suggests that demand for management education is fading. It suggests, rather, that the centre of gravity is shifting decisively — toward India, toward Southeast Asia, toward markets where an expanding middle class and a growing corporate sector are producing precisely the kind of ambitious, credential-seeking professional who has always been the MBA's natural constituency. At the very summit of the market, meanwhile, Harvard, Wharton, INSEAD, and London Business School remain as fiercely competitive as ever, because scarcity and brand equity at that altitude are largely insulated from broader market cycles.


Online learning tells a parallel story of absorption rather than displacement. A decade ago, MOOCs and online MBAs were framed as the insurgent alternative to the traditional degree. Today, they are simply features of it. Business schools have folded hybrid delivery, flexible formats, and digital case-study platforms directly into their core offering. The disruptor was, in the end, hired.


3. Why Does the MBA Keep Surviving?

Every disruption narrative has made the same category error: treating the MBA primarily as a mechanism for delivering content. If the degree were only a vehicle for transmitting knowledge — accounting principles, strategic frameworks, financial modelling — then a well-curated video series or a capable AI assistant could plausibly replace large parts of it.


But that has never been the actual product. What an MBA sells is something structurally far harder to replicate.


  • The Cohort - Eighteen months to two years spent solving problems alongside sixty to three hundred other ambitious professionals builds a peer network whose value compounds for decades. No platform, however elegantly designed, can replicate the trust forged through shared late-night case preparation and the friction of group work.


  • The Selection Signal - An MBA from a competitive programme tells an employer that a rigorous admissions process has already filtered for ambition, judgement, and baseline competence. A certificate that anyone can obtain carries no equivalent weight.


  • Cross-Functional Immersion - Bootcamps cultivate depth in a narrow skill. MOOCs teach a single subject well. An MBA compels the marketing-minded student to sit through finance and the engineer to sit through organisational behaviour — building precisely the generalist judgement that specialised training rarely produces.


  • Career Transition Infrastructure - Career services, recruiting pipelines, alumni networks, and structured internships exist at a scale that no six-week bootcamp has built, or is likely to build.


The AI Question Is Genuinely Different

Artificial intelligence poses a different order of challenge to this model, because unlike MOOCs or bootcamps, it threatens to hollow out the analytical exercises that once justified a meaningful share of MBA coursework. But the schools growing fastest today are not the ones treating this as a threat to be defended against. They are the ones embedding AI literacy directly into the curriculum, treating it as the newest core competency to be taught rather than resisted — precisely the pattern that played out with online learning a decade earlier.


4. What Would It Actually Take to Replace the MBA?

Not a superior content platform. Content was never the scarce resource.

Displacing the MBA would require building, from first principles:

  • A credible admissions filter that employers genuinely trust

  • A dense, high-trust peer network with demonstrable career payoff

  • A recruiting infrastructure that rivals decades of accumulated corporate relationships

  • A brand resilient enough to survive its own hype cycle


That is an extraordinarily high threshold to clear, and it explains why every disruptor to date has ended up as a feature absorbed into the MBA rather than a force that replaced it.


5. The Real Signal for Business Schools

None of this implies complacency. The data should be read as a warning in equal measure to a reassurance.

  • Programmes that depend purely on international mobility and geographic prestige remain exposed to policy shifts entirely beyond their control.

  • Institutions that treat AI as a threat rather than a curricular opportunity will steadily lose ground to those that do not.

  • The flight to quality at the top of the market means the middle tier now faces the most genuine pressure of any segment in the industry.

 


 

Conclusion: Not Dying, Migrating

The underlying premise — that the MBA is structurally finished — has been wrong for three decades, across six distinct disruption cycles, and the 2024–2025 data suggests it remains wrong today. The degree is not dying. It is migrating toward new geographies, absorbing new technologies, and doing what it has always done: adapting just quickly enough to outpace whatever is presumed to kill it next.


The MBA has outlived every prediction of its demise. The more interesting question was never truly “is it dying.” It has always been “where is it going next” — and at present, the answer runs through India, through Southeast Asia, and through a curriculum finally prepared to take artificial intelligence seriously rather than dismiss it.

 

 

 

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page